Securitization an Art or a curse?
Securitization
an Art or a curse?
-by Abhishek Maity
Securitization is a procedure where an issuer creates
a financial instrument by pooling together various financial assets into one
group. An advanced form of the above process is a mortgage-backed security
which is a pool of only mortgages exclusively.
Assume that a bank has a lot of housing loans on the
book which provide returns in terms of interests and principal payments to the
bank plus these loans are also guaranteed by the underlying housing properties
known as mortgages. But then an investment bank approaches the older bank to
create a new financial instrument by pooling all the housing loans into
different tranches according to their credit-worthiness, known as
collateralized debit obligations (CDOs) and then selling units of these CDOs to
a different class of investors.
So, our traditional bank get returns from the usual
interest payments plus the money received by selling the pooled assets and the
investment bank who gets the fair share of the deal.
Why it became so famous before the housing crises of
2008?
After the dot-com burst of 2000’s the USA government
swing into motion to tackle the economic challenges posed by this crash. The
measures included lower interest rates on loans, policies to promote house
ownerships, excess inflow of funds into the housing market which all together
fueled the demand and valuation of the housing properties to astronomical
heights, the price of a house on an average in USA was around $314,000 in 2007.
Buoyed by such an encouraging milieu in the housing market,
such properties were considered as the safest asset class, even if the person
defaulted the banks could get the highly valued property. Hence the CDOs
consisting of these properties were given triple A ratings by most of the
credit rating agencies and a number of investment banks started acting as third
parties brokering deals between the investors and the owners of such housing
loans.
What caused the investment banks to lose their money?
But as it
became clear that the banks were making loans to groups who were highly likely
to default on loan payments and the investment bankers creating pooled assets
of such low-quality loans, but these were shown as assets backed by real
estates on the firm’s books which further amplified the firm’s valuations. But
firms like Lehman Brothers and others also borrowed funds to create new types
of instruments like synthetic-CDOs, super seniors, Repo 105, square-CDOs so on,
all of whose earnings were dependent on the blossoming housing market and when
the weather turned against the cordial surroundings in real estate market which
diminished the valuation of the underlying assets and these assets
which where once considered the safest categories now were seen by banks as
highly toxic assets. As a result the supply of houses in the market swelled as lot of people were defaulting but
the demand for these were less, depressing the prices further and magnifying
the sentiment in the economy against the housing market.
Since
investment banks operated on leverage to earn profits this problem of moral
hazard hit the ones hardest who weren’t prudent with their lending practices
and risk management solutions. During the first half of 2008 Lehman Brothers
had a total-assets of $680 billion supported by only $22.5 billion of firm
capital along with a $4.3 billion in only mortgage securities which implied how
vulnerable was this firm to the gyrations in the market. And close to 100 hedge
fund firms were dealing with Lehman as result the erosion of financial assets
quickly spread through the U.S economy, like Freddie Mac had to write off $400
million and Framer Mac had to let go of around $54.5 million as a result of
Lehman bankruptcy.
It is really
bewitching that an instrument which reduce the risk of default and increased
returns ended up spreading that risk among larger number of market participants
creating channels of transmission for market sentiments which finally lead to
the 2008 financial crises.
Comments
Post a Comment